CloudHosting.io

AWS Lightsail vs Heroku

AWS Lightsail is strongest for AWS ecosystem users. Heroku is strongest for teams migrating away. Here's how they stack up on price, uptime, and support.

FeatureAWS LightsailHeroku
Starting price$0.8/mo$3/mo
Best for
  • AWS ecosystem users
  • Predictable bundled pricing
  • Windows workloads
  • Teams migrating away
  • Legacy Rails/Node apps
  • Historical PaaS comparison
Stated uptime SLA99.9%99.5% (Postgres Essential); higher SLAs on Standard/Premium/Private/Shield not separately published
StorageSSDSSD
Regions162
Managed KubernetesNoNo
Support channelsAWS Support plans (separate from Lightsail), Community forums, DocsTicket, Docs (Dev Center), Community forum
ComplianceSOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA eligibleSOC 2, HIPAA (Shield tier only), GDPR, PCI (Shield tier only)
Hidden costs to watch for
  • Data transfer overage varies significantly by AWS region ($0.09-$0.132/GB)
  • Windows bundles cost 70-90% more than equivalent Linux bundles
  • Eco dynos ($5/mo flat) are personal-account only and not available to Enterprise/Team customers
  • Postgres Essential tier has no fork/follow, no HA, and only 99.5% uptime SLA -- a hidden reliability cliff vs. Standard
  • Add-on overages (Postgres row/connection limits, Redis memory limits) can force an unplanned upgrade to the next tier
  • Performance dynos require an established payment/billing history before they can be provisioned
  • Private Spaces and Shield Private Spaces carry a substantial network-isolation premium (2-3x) over common-runtime equivalents
  • Heroku Postgres Advanced tier pricing is not published; requires contacting sales
Last reviewed2026-07-172026-07-18

Neither one feels right?

Answer a few questions and get matched against every provider in our catalog — or start from what you're building instead.